粉尘爆炸,干馏过程,爆炸特性,风险评估,评估模型," /> 粉尘爆炸,干馏过程,爆炸特性,风险评估,评估模型,"/> dust explosion,retorting process,explosive characteristics,risk assessment,evaluation model,"/> <p class="MsoPlainText"> 油页岩干馏工艺粉尘爆炸风险评估研究
Please wait a minute...
沈阳化工大学学报, 2023, 37(5): 435-442    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2198.2023.05.007
  生物与环境工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |

油页岩干馏工艺粉尘爆炸风险评估研究

1沈阳化工大学 环境与安全工程学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110142;2沈阳化工大学 化学工程学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110142

Research on Dust Explosion Risk Assessment of Oil Shale Retorting Process

(1.College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China;

2.College of Chemical Engineering, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China)

下载:  PDF (1550KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

为了更加全面地评估油页岩干馏炼油生产过程中发生粉尘爆炸的风险,提出了结合G1法、熵权法、博弈论和云模型理论的油页岩干馏工艺粉尘爆炸风险综合评估方法.该方法运用G1法和熵权法确定评价指标主客观权重,继而用博弈论方法计算综合权重值,并结合云模型判定粉尘爆炸风险等级.基于物料的爆炸特性,从人、物、环境和管理四个方面建立油页岩干馏工艺粉尘爆炸风险评估体系,并将工艺典型的危险因素归结成4大类和30项;以抚顺式油页岩干馏炼油工艺进行实例分析,得到的云模型数字特征为(6054322079),爆炸风险为中等风险,并通过与层次分析法-模糊综合评价、AHP-熵权法组合赋权-可拓模型,及集对分析-可变模糊集法对比,验证了本模型的有效性.评估结果表明:该粉尘爆炸风险评估体系和评估方法具有针对性、可操作性及结果直观性,可为油页岩干馏工艺粉尘防爆风险研究提供参考.

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词:  粉尘爆炸')" href="#">

粉尘爆炸  干馏过程  爆炸特性  风险评估  评估模型    

Abstract: 

To evaluate the dust explosion risk in oil shale retorting process more comprehensively,a comprehensive risk assessment method for dust explosion in oil shale retorting process was proposed combining G1 method,entropy weight method,game theory and cloud model theory.The  method uses G1 method and entropy weight method to determine the subjective and objective weight of evaluation index,and then calculates the comprehensive weight value by game theory method,and combines cloud model to determine the risk level of dust explosion.Based on the explosive characteristics of materials,the dust explosion risk assessment system of oil shale retorting process was established from four aspects of human,material,environment and management.The typical risk factors were classified into four categories and 30 items.Taking the Fushun style oil shale dry distillation refining process as an example for analysis,the numerical characteristics of the cloud model were (6054,322,079),and the explosion risk was moderate.The effectiveness of the model was verified by comparing it with analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation,analytic hierarchy process - entropy weight method combined weight - extension model and variable fuzzy set pairing method.The research results show that the dust explosion risk assessment system and evaluation method of oil shale retorting process have strong pertinence and operability and the evaluation results are intuitive,which can provide reference for the study of dust explosion risk in oil shale retorting process.

Key words:  dust explosion')" href="#">

dust explosion    retorting process    explosive characteristics    risk assessment    evaluation model

               出版日期:  2023-10-27      发布日期:  2024-06-06      整期出版日期:  2023-10-27
ZTFLH: 

X932

 
基金资助: 

辽宁省科技厅博士启动基金资助项目(2019-BS-188);辽宁省教育厅科学研究经费资助项目(LQ2020024)

通讯作者:  于立富   
作者简介:  王天枢(1998—),男,辽宁铁岭人,硕士研究生在读,主要从事工业爆炸理论与防治技术研究.
引用本文:    
王天枢1, 于立富1, 李航1, 孙威2.

油页岩干馏工艺粉尘爆炸风险评估研究 [J]. 沈阳化工大学学报, 2023, 37(5): 435-442.
YU Lifu1, WANG Tianshu1, LI Hang1, SUN Wei2.

Research on Dust Explosion Risk Assessment of Oil Shale Retorting Process . Journal of Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, 2023, 37(5): 435-442.

链接本文:  
https://xuebao.syuct.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.2095-2198.2023.05.007  或          https://xuebao.syuct.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V37/I5/435

1]武林湲,于立富,王天枢,等.密闭空间油页岩粉尘爆炸特性研究[J].爆炸与冲击,2022,42(1):154-163.

2]杨红霞,李刚,苑春苗,等.油页岩粉尘层着火的理论模型与实验研究[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2016,37(12):1768-1771.

3]于立富,李刚,潘超,等.中国油页岩粉尘爆炸特性实验研究[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2016,37(8):1203-1206.

4]李刚,杨红霞,于立富.油页岩利用过程粉尘爆炸研究现状及趋势分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):38-42.

5]陶梦醒,汪涛.基于FTA-BN模型的粉尘爆炸风险评估及控制研究[J].工业安全与环保,2022,48(6):43-46.

6]王秋红,汪雪繁,邓军,等.基于组合赋权-突变级数法的铝镁合金抛光现场爆炸风险分析[J].安全与环境学报,2022,22(5):2313-2321.

7]张秀玲.基于SEM-BN的木地板加工车间粉尘爆炸风险评估[D].武汉:武汉科技大学,2020:1-87.

8]靳江红,李鑫磊,王庆.粉尘爆炸风险评估方法及应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(7):164-169.

9]何峥,顾保虎.基于蝴蝶结-贝叶斯网络的可燃性粉尘环境风险评估模型探讨[J].电气防爆,2019(6):35-38,42.

10]YU L F,LI G,LIU W C,et al.Experimental Investigations on Ignition Sensitivity of Hybrid Mixtures of Oil Shale Dust and Syngas[J].Fuel,〖JP〗2017,210:1-7.

11]栾婷婷,赵文统,周思萌,等.基于FTA的木制品粉尘爆炸事故分析[J].北京石油化工学院学报,2017,25(1):41-45.

12]孟宇强,宫博.WBS-RBS和AHP的方法在化工园区安全容量评价的应用[J].沈阳化工大学学报,2020,34(4):334-337,384.

13]张梦雅,龙祖根,唐志鹏.基于改进FAHP模型的煤尘爆炸危险性评价研究[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(10):47-50.

14]曾韬.基于博弈论综合权重法与灰色模糊理论相结合的组合评估模型研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2018:32-37.

15]卢丹丹,宋文华,张桂钏,等.基于AHP-熵权法的石化企业承灾体脆弱性评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):180-185.

16]乐有邦,张发涛,胡维西,等.中美两国粉尘爆炸风险评估对比研究与分析[J].工业安全与环保,2020,46(11):60-62,96.

17]谢鹏,吕鹏飞.基于改进云模型-IAHP的涉爆粉尘企业安全风险评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(8):187-192.

18]付净,聂方超,刘虹,等.化工企业安全管理体系评估指标集的构建及实证分析[J].安全与环境工程,2020,27(1):126-132.

19]刘禹,李德毅.正态云模型雾化性质统计分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2010,36(11):1320-1324.

No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed